TOPIC 1 wk 5

c) Paras 14-15 Are those who want to make DIY news online, best thought of as part of an alternative culture (that also exists offline) or is it more diverse than that? Think of examples beyond Indymedia.

From the theory given, it seems DIY culture is meant to be a hyper modern practise that allows for more radical and individual opinions to be brought to light. There seems to be an emphasis on driving a gap between professionalised and amateur journalism. It's offline practise example was punk and the alternative music movement. As inspiring as this idea is, I disagree that all Indymedia is as 'out there' as what is described. DIY journalism allows for less restricted opinions - be them influenced by politics, gender, age, religion, place or experience. Although this will always bring out the people wishing for a 'blank generation', it also give amateur journalists and opinionated individuals a chance to share their experiences with others. I haven't an example for this yet, but I see topical blogs as a good starting point. (Check for updates later.)

It is understandable that Meikle would wish to distinguish himself and other academic professionals over Indymedia journalists - however I think it brings to light an important question; What is more important, academic approval, experience or talent? Should there be equal amounts of these factors or can a talented amateur create more entertaining and relevant news occasionally? I personally think so.